How can you turn a lurker into an active contributor?
(I saw this asked somewhere else and thought it would be worth adding here to get input from the community, Iāll come back to it shortly.)
How can you turn a lurker into an active contributor?
(I saw this asked somewhere else and thought it would be worth adding here to get input from the community, Iāll come back to it shortly.)
Perhaps avoiding the term ālurkerā may help. The term seems rather pejorative and if a lurker becomes aware that the community leaders think of them in this way, it is more likely to distance them, than move them closer.
Sure, I donāt like the name either, but itās also one that people recognise.
What would you use instead?
āObserverā or āaudienceā springs to mind.
They both sound better than lurker. I imagine that many of us are observing/following/monitoring more communities than we are actively engaged in.
I do like all the ideas @rosiesherry gathered, suggested and created for the āLurkers are people tooā diagram.
I agree lurker is the historically recognized word for non-contributors. I wish community professionals could agree on a better term.
I usually reframe the word lurkers as learners when community planning because they are the majority of my audience.
Then I ask myself/my team - How can we build a community they want to contribute to? Are we using non-inclusive language that is stopping interaction?
Next, I think of other ways people can contribute.
I find when I give members a bit more scaffolding and attention, they are more likely to start contributing. And if they contribute, I do my best to interact with the post, even calling on internal team members or moderators to comment and interact.
Great list hereā¦a few other thoughts:
ālegitimate peripheral participationā
āLove Our Lurkers Weekā ā what a fantastic idea and initiative. Thanks for sharing, @evanhamilton.
For those reading, hereās the article that supports the talk: https://www.digitalmarketer.com/blog/activate-community-members/